Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 13:31:56 06/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
. > >Yes i mean such code size issues, three bytes more per load store ;-) >At least one should try to keep the most often used locals inside this -128/127 >range. Maybe POGO handles such issues. 4KByte and more requires some call >checkstack for paging reasons. I tend to put things on an explicit stack, >specially if items are still less than 128 sized. Of course more important is whether one need some data of previous plies. Direct ply-wise index access on an explicit array of nodes versus traversing nodes on stack via pointer from node to parent nodes. Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.