Author: David Mitchell
Date: 03:04:44 06/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2004 at 09:24:06, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 23, 2004 at 22:50:38, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>Do we have now have machines on desktops equal to Deep Blue in strength as Don >>Daily suggested may happen in 10 years or less back in 1999? >> >>http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=44793 >> >>Let's hear your opinions! > >Because it used a very inefficient fullwidth search and even more inefficient >parallel search. > >Further its evaluation function was like gnuchess 4.0 with a few bugfixes here >and there. > >In short deep blue is a very bad example to compare. > >It's like DIEP on a supercomputer. You keep making these comparisons, Vincent - and without justification. 1) Diep never played against Deep Blue 2) Diep never played or beat Kasparov (or any other World Champion) in a match So why keep making these comparisons? It's just utter nonsense! > They are really beginners level. In those days i could win any rook endgame >from such programs, against crafty even with 2 pawns down. You might win such an ending once in a blue moon against Crafty, but you're overstating your ability, here. And understating Deep Blue's. Perhaps to make you and Diep look better? Hmmmm! Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.