Author: Mihaly Szalai
Date: 09:23:07 06/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2004 at 11:45:21, John Merlino wrote: >On June 25, 2004 at 11:25:17, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: > >> Emir Dizdarevic vs GM A. Miles, Biel 1985 >> [D]r4rk1/pbpn2pp/1p2p3/5p2/2NP3q/1P1BP3/PBQ2PP1/3R1RK1 b >> And here GM Miles played 15...Bf3!!, winning in a few moves. >> Source ==> http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1097658 > >A little comparison. First the Chessmaster 9000 engine (The King v3.23) with >default settings (64MB Hash) on a P4-2.4: >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/4 2.01 19119 1...Rf6 2.f3 Rh6 3.Ne5 Nxe5 4.dxe5 >0:00 1/4 0.00 19892 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg5+ 3.Kh3 Qg4+ > 4.Kh2 Qh4+ 5.Kg1 Qg5+ 6.Kh1 Qh6+ > 7.Kg1 Qg5+ >0:00 1/5 0.00 25628 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg5+ 3.Kh3 Qg4+ > 4.Kh2 Qh4+ 5.Kg1 Qg5+ 6.Kh1 Qh6+ > 7.Kg1 Qg5+ >0:00 1/6 0.00 49655 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg5+ 3.Kh1 Qh6+ > 4.Kg1 Qg5+ 5.Kh1 >0:01 1/7 -0.25 212719 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Qh1+ 3.Kf2 Qh3 4.Ke2 > Bxf1+ 5.Rxf1 b5 6.Ne5 Nxe5 7.dxe5 >0:02 1/8 -0.14 456402 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Qh1+ 3.Kf2 Bxf1 4.Bxf1 > Rad8 5.Bg2 Qh4+ 6.Kg1 b5 7.Na5 c5 >0:06 1/9 -0.10 1250892 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Qh1+ 3.Kf2 Bxf1 4.Rxf1 > Qh6 5.Rg1 Rf7 6.Ba3 Qh3 7.Bf1 >0:11 1/9 -1.74 2369544 1...Bf3 2.Bxf5 Rxf5 3.Qxf5 exf5 > 4.gxf3 Qh3 5.Nd2 Nf6 6.Rc1 Nd5 > 7.Rfd1 >0:17 1/10 -2.32 3993044 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Bh3 4.Ne4 > Bxf1 5.Rxf1 fxe4 6.Bxe4 Qg3+ 7.Kh1 > Qh3+ 8.Kg1 Rac8 >0:30 2/11 -2.67 6932181 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Rf6 4.Bxf5 > Rxf5 5.Qxf5 exf5 6.Kxg2 Re8 7.e4 > Re6 8.Rfe1 Rg6+ 9.Kf1 >1:15 3/12 -2.97 18746024 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Rf6 4.Ne4 > fxe4 5.Qxg2 exd3 6.Qh2 Qg5+ 7.Kf2 > Rxf3+ 8.Kxf3 Rf8+ 9.Qf4 Qh5+ 10.Kf2 > Rxf4+ 11.exf4 >2:50 4/13 -3.02 45770011 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Bh3 4.Ne4 > fxe4 5.Bxe4 Qg3+ 6.Kh1 Bxf1 7.Rxf1 > Rf6 8.Qh2 Qxh2+ 9.Kxh2 Rh6+ 10.Kg1 > Rd8 11.f4 Rh3 > >Now the Chessmaster 10th Edition engine (The King v3.33) on the same position: >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/4 2.61 6342 1...Rad8 2.Ba3 Rfe8 3.Nd2 >0:00 1/4 0.00 14088 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg4+ 3.Kh1 Qh3+ > 4.Kg1 Qg4+ 5.Kh1 >0:00 1/5 0.00 25939 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg4+ 3.Kh1 Qh3+ > 4.Kg1 Qg4+ 5.Kh1 >0:00 1/6 0.00 49581 1...Bxg2 2.Kxg2 Qg4+ 3.Kh1 Qh3+ > 4.Kg1 Qg4+ 5.Kh1 >0:00 2/7 -0.09 160625 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Qh1+ 3.Kf2 Bxf1 4.Rxf1 > Qh4+ 5.Ke2 b5 6.Ne5 Nxe5 7.dxe5 >0:02 2/8 -0.04 440265 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Bxf1 3.Bxf1 b5 4.Ne5 > Qg5+ 5.Kf2 Nxe5 6.dxe5 Qh4+ 7.Kg1 >0:06 2/9 -0.07 1448085 1...Bxg2 2.f3 Qh1+ 3.Kf2 Qh3 4.Rg1 > Bxf3 5.Rdf1 Bd5 6.Ba3 Qh4+ 7.Ke2 > Qh2+ 8.Kd1 >0:10 2/9 -0.70 2129285 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Qg3 4.Ne4 > fxe4 5.Qxg2 Qxg2+ 6.Kxg2 exd3 7.Rxd3 > Rad8 8.d5 e5 >0:23 3/10 -2.18 4976599 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Bh3 4.Ne4 > Bxf1 5.Rxf1 fxe4 6.Bxe4 Qg3+ 7.Qg2 > Qxg2+ 8.Kxg2 >0:38 3/11 -2.25 9188867 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Bh3 4.Ne4 > Bxf1 5.Rxf1 fxe4 6.Bxe4 Rac8 7.Qg2 > Nf6 >1:10 3/12 -2.24 17445021 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Bh3 4.Ne4 > Bxf1 5.Rxf1 fxe4 6.Bxe4 Qg3+ 7.Qg2 > Qxg2+ 8.Kxg2 Rad8 9.Rh1 Nf6 >3:17 4/13 -2.94 49229898 1...Bf3 2.Nd2 Bxg2 3.f3 Rf6 4.Ne4 > fxe4 5.Qxg2 exd3 6.Qh2 Qg5+ 7.Kf2 > Rxf3+ 8.Kxf3 Rf8+ 9.Qf4 Qh5+ 10.Kg3 > Rxf4 11.Kxf4 > >First of all, note that both of these were done in the CM9 GUI, so I have no way >of knowing if the CMX engine would perform differently inside the CMX GUI. > >The times and evals are pretty close, no way to determine anything significant >from them. But does anybody notice something rather interesting? :-) > >jm The main line is different. Or something else? Btw John, have you noticed that the CMX.obk is exactly the same as the CM9000.obk? Mihaly
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.