Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:24:59 06/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2004 at 16:36:19, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >Just a note that I got my hashing working in a >quick hack program I've put together for other >reasons and it was nasty even though I've been >through it over and over through the decades. >I empathize with other hashers who have felt or >are feeling hashed. > >It is well worth it. A typical 8 ply search early >in the game might reduce 50%+ in total nodes searched >and 50%+ in total time. > >These are dwarfed by null move's effect though in >the same positions (90% and 90%). > >So my question is, these are well-known methods to >substantially reduce the number of nodes and amount >of time for most searches -- I wonder if there is >anything else that is as large and as comparable >at these large 50%/90% types of reductions. > >Stuart another 50% or more. Limit your q-search captures so you don't look at silly captures that obviously just lose material.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.