Author: James T. Walker
Date: 07:50:02 06/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2004 at 10:23:21, David Dahlem wrote: >On June 26, 2004 at 08:15:16, Jason Kent wrote: > >>Hmm. The 10k demo isn't performing very well at all. From what I've seen, cm9k >>is stronger. Even List512 did better in my 3/0 tourney in arena. I'm thinking >>that it must be running at Selective search = 6!? I'm going to pass the sel=9 >>argument to it next. >> >>1: DEFAULT cm9k 40.5/70 >>2: Ruffian_105 39.5/69 >>3: R1 (cm9k) 38.0/69 >>4: g-force(cm9k) 37.5/69 >>5: List512 37.0/69 >>6: CM 10th Ed 35.5/71 >>7: Thinker 4.5e 34.5/69 >>8: Crafty 19.12 28.5/70 >>9: Aristarch 4.50 22.0/70 >> >>Just tell me if you want the pgn and I'll email it to you. > >Game in 3 minutes? Wow, those results are really meaningful. :-) > >Dave The results are as meaningful as any other tournament with an equal number of gsmes played. The time control is just one of the paramaters you have to consider when evaluating the results. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.