Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:54:40 06/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2004 at 12:43:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 28, 2004 at 12:37:42, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>On June 28, 2004 at 08:54:00, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >> >>>settings, and then N games with the new settings. I am only really interested >>>in longer timecontrols: 20 min + on an Athlon 2.0G or so (70 min on P-650, etc), >> >> >>Why long time controls? I thought you could test evaluation with shorter time >>controls, search needed longer (or varied) time controls. Am I out in left >>field? >> >>Dan H. > > >My personal belief is that longer controls are better. Short games rely heavily >on the search, and leaves a better chance for random luck to influence the >outcome. Deeper searches tend to make fewer tactical mistakes, leaving the >outcome to the quality of the evaluation.... You have to balance that with the number of games you will get. - Correspondence games will not give enough information. - Bullet games will give a lot of information but probably not reliable enough. The interesting question is then: Where is the optimum. Quality versus quantity! /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.