Author: Frank Phillips
Date: 13:09:24 06/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2004 at 12:43:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 28, 2004 at 12:37:42, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>On June 28, 2004 at 08:54:00, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >> >>>settings, and then N games with the new settings. I am only really interested >>>in longer timecontrols: 20 min + on an Athlon 2.0G or so (70 min on P-650, etc), >> >> >>Why long time controls? I thought you could test evaluation with shorter time >>controls, search needed longer (or varied) time controls. Am I out in left >>field? >> >>Dan H. > > >My personal belief is that longer controls are better. Short games rely heavily >on the search, and leaves a better chance for random luck to influence the >outcome. Deeper searches tend to make fewer tactical mistakes, leaving the >outcome to the quality of the evaluation.... Two questions for clarification: Does this presuppose diminishing returns? And what quality is the evaluation measuring that is different from the prospect of future tactics? I find these tactics versus evaluation debates hard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.