Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:34:40 06/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2004 at 18:16:39, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On June 28, 2004 at 16:44:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 28, 2004 at 12:37:42, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>On June 28, 2004 at 08:54:00, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>> >>> >>>>settings, and then N games with the new settings. I am only really interested >>>>in longer timecontrols: 20 min + on an Athlon 2.0G or so (70 min on P-650, etc), >>> >>> >>>Why long time controls? I thought you could test evaluation with shorter time >>>controls, search needed longer (or varied) time controls. Am I out in left >>>field? >>> >>>Dan H. >> >>Do you believe the commercial authors at home only test at 1 0 level? > >No, but their situation is different than mine. They have mature engines with >evaluation values that are somewhere near right. I've got a green engine with >evaluation values that are junk. I'm looking at short time control tests to get >me headed in the right direction. Got to walk before you run. :) > >Dan H. Why do you suggest it works for crafty to play 1 0?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.