Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 10:13:19 06/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2004 at 12:34:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 28, 2004 at 18:16:39, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>On June 28, 2004 at 16:44:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On June 28, 2004 at 12:37:42, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >>> >>>>On June 28, 2004 at 08:54:00, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>settings, and then N games with the new settings. I am only really interested >>>>>in longer timecontrols: 20 min + on an Athlon 2.0G or so (70 min on P-650, etc), >>>> >>>> >>>>Why long time controls? I thought you could test evaluation with shorter time >>>>controls, search needed longer (or varied) time controls. Am I out in left >>>>field? >>>> >>>>Dan H. >>> >>>Do you believe the commercial authors at home only test at 1 0 level? >> >>No, but their situation is different than mine. They have mature engines with >>evaluation values that are somewhere near right. I've got a green engine with >>evaluation values that are junk. I'm looking at short time control tests to get >>me headed in the right direction. Got to walk before you run. :) >> >>Dan H. > >Why do you suggest it works for crafty to play 1 0? I never mentioned crafty. But same as the commercials - it's evaluation values are a lot more refined than mine. What do you recommend for someone like me starting from scratch? Will short time control testing better my evaluation or do you think it's a waste of time? Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.