Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 10:28:27 06/29/04

Go up one level in this thread

On June 29, 2004 at 12:54:44, Joshua Shriver wrote:

>One of my main points is that HW does place a crucial role.
>
>I run a crafty bot on FICS right now. I have a Dual G4 533mhz box and I've
>beaten other (C) accounts running shredder/Fritz/Hiarcs who ran on slower
>hardware.
>
>Is crafty better? Not necessarily, just that I had better hardware at the time.
>
>-Josh


Hi Josh,

I tried compiling version 14 with "make darwin" and got errors on the labels
for _firsone _lastone _popcnt or something like that.  That's using gccc of
course.

Did you use gcc?  I'd like to compare crafty on my 900 mhz mac notebook with my
900 mhz Duron (linux).

• Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty Joshua Shriver 23:25:25 06/29/04
  • Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty Matthew Hull 06:05:24 06/30/04
    • Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty Joshua Shriver 13:31:56 06/30/04
      • Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty Matthew Hull 14:06:36 06/30/04
        • Re: WCCC: Almost no hardware advantage for Crafty Joshua Shriver 00:34:56 07/01/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.