Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Palm Chess Comparison

Author: Mark R. Anderson

Date: 12:12:34 07/01/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2004 at 11:58:26, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>On July 01, 2004 at 10:05:08, Alain Lyrette wrote:
>
>>
>>On June 30, 2004 at 17:17:21, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On June 30, 2004 at 11:10:48, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>>>
>>>>     Please see ==> http://www.hiarcs.com/competitor_comparison.htm
>>>>
>>>>Let's not beat around the bush, if you are looking for the strongest and best
>>>>Palm chess program you have probably been looking at Chess Tiger, Chess Genius
>>>>and HIARCS. HIARCS is not only the clear strongest chess program on the Palm,
>>>>but it also has the best features. The stronger the Palm chess software, the
>>>>better it is able to teach and help you learn and improve your chess.
>>>>
>>>>The following comparison table will help you understand why HIARCS is head and
>>>>shoulders above its so-called "competitors".
>>>
>>>I had no problems to draw all my 10 min games against Hiarcs 9 on a 2 Ghz
>>>machine.
>>>And now Hiarcs 9.3 on a Palm Tungsten is 2591 ELO FIDE?
>>>That´s ridiculous.
>>>
>>>just my 2 cents
>>>
>>>Michael
>>2591 is ridiculus indeed.So is your claim of 10 draws in a row.
>
>Better read carefully.
>I didn`t claim to have drawn 10 1 min games in a row (that would indeed be
>ridiculous), I claimed to have drawn (or won on time) some games with time
>control 10 minutes for the game.

OK, so 2591 might be too high ... *but* ... now you say you drew or won "some
games", when before you said "no problems to draw all my 10 min games against
Hiarcs 9 on a 2 Ghz machine." (Quoted from above)  With all due respect, that's
an even more ridiculous claim than the 2591.  If you can draw "all games"
against Hiarcs 9 on a 2 Ghz machine with "no problems", then you must be a world
class Grandmaster! ... Although even they (GMs) would have severe problems doing
that.  Perhaps if your last name was the right "K" .... say, Kasparov or
Kramnik.

Again, no offense intended, just making an observation.

Mark Anderson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.