Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 21:01:50 07/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2004 at 22:55:30, Bruce Humphrey wrote: >On June 30, 2004 at 18:48:13, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On June 30, 2004 at 08:56:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>[D]2r4k/ppqbpp1p/3p1npQ/3R4/2r1P1P1/2N2P2/PPP1N3/1K5R w >>> >>> >>>I tested this position with the Mach III Master back in 1989, it took about >>>1hr.09min. to find Rf5!! with the double threat of Rxf6! and Nd5! >>> >>>Daniel >> >>Pocket PC Genius 1:58 >>Pocket Grandmaster (Ruffian) ~12:00 >>Pocket Fritz 2 ~31:20 (on the 12th ply ) >> >> >>Dell Axim 590 Mhz (oc) > >Are you sure? You should be getting better results (I expect)! I thought genius >2.1 for palm was the same soft (basically) than pocket pc genius? Either that, >or it is true that Pocket PC (operating system) is a resources hog (in >comparisson with palm and symbian) > >In my palm T3 (400 Mhz arm) >-Hiarcs 9.32 palm: depth 7, 23sec* >-Genius 2.1 (arm): depth 8, 01:44 , 61880 n/sec >-Tiger 15.1: depth 8, 04:33** > >*- Hiarcs does 'see it' at 18sec, but doesn't select the move until 23 sec > >**- In Tiger depth 8, at 180 sec Rf6 is move 31/51. Then at 232 sec it gives it >a ! (meaning it has discovered it is a lot better than previously thought) and >it ends selecting it at 273 sec > >Bruce Humphrey in Genius hashsize matters a lot, tell me what hashsize you ran it at and I will rerun the test.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.