Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 11:35:08 07/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2004 at 11:59:31, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On July 02, 2004 at 09:12:29, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>On July 02, 2004 at 07:46:34, Johan Havegheer wrote: >> >>>On July 02, 2004 at 07:30:43, Ernst Walet wrote: >>> >>>>I think your XP2600+ was slow, see my results below. Athlon XP2400+@2.2GHz >>>> >>>>CPU0: AuthenticAMD x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 1 2200 MHz >>>>GUI: Tablebases with 5 pieces found! [Cache: 64 MB + internal 13.67 MB] >>>>Engine: Shredder 8 (256 MB) >>>>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >>> >>>That's not serious Ernst !!!! AMDXP 2400+ @ 2.2Ghz is just as fast as an >>>AMD XP3000+. >>> >>>But the AMD 64 is really a fast thing for chess. Stefan told me that his AMD 64 >>>3200+ at the last ICT tournement was faster for shredder than a dual Xeon >>>2.4Ghz. >>> >>>So when Shredder will play on a 4xOpteron in Israel it will rock ! >>> >>>Best >>>Johan Havegheer >> >>Johan, >> >>A XP2600+ runs at 2.13GHz, not that much difference. Futhermore an XP2600+ runs >>at 166MHz, and a XP2400+ at 133MHz. So practically there is not much difference >>between his system and mine. >> >>So it is serious, although I'm not sure what you mean by serious... >> >>Regards, >>Ernst. > >There are many variations of the Athlon XP 2600+. One infact runs 1916.6MHz >(11.5x166) and has 512k L2. This is the model 10 XP. The model 8 XP with 256K L2 >runs in two flavors. The 2083MHz 166fsb version and the 2133.3MHz 133MHz fsb >version. The mobile Athlon XP 2600+ has 512K of L2 and runs 2GHz with a 133MHz >fsb. > >Since L2 doesn't make a difference on these chips in chess.. you're looking at a >maximum performance difference of 11.3% between the 2600+ chips. Ok thanks, I thought that the last 133MHz XP was the 2400+ Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.