Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 12:00:25 07/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2004 at 11:48:24, Volker Böhm wrote: >On July 02, 2004 at 03:07:46, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 02, 2004 at 02:14:07, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>...simply chances are not big, when in comp-comp play Crafty is at least 150 >>>points weaker than best engines. It needs 8 times faster PC to equal. >>> >>>Jouni >> >> >>4 times faster than the computers used by Shredder, Junior and Fritz should be >>enough to equal the Elo strength, otherwise, it is NOT just 150 points Weaker >>than the best engines :-) >> >>Jorge > >Hi, > >As far as I know you need more than 4 times the computer speed to get 150 ELO. > >One ply deeper takes about 2-3 times more time. The amount of elo gained from an >additional ply search depth is about 50 (for shallow search) to 30 (for very >deep search). All these engines are allready searching deep thus 150 elo needs >about 3-4 plys of search depth. Thus the hardware must be about (2,5)^3,5 = ca. >25 times faster to get these 150 elo´s by hardware. > >Luck is the biggest factor to win at WCCC as they do not play many games. > >Greetings Volker Based on your definition Ruffian 2.0.0 on an AMD XP 2400+ is NOT as strong as Shredder 8 on an AMD K-6 2+ 600 Mhz. :-) Rating + - Games Won Av.opp 1 Shredder 8.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2818 34 -32 481 70% 2673 2 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2809 24 -23 967 71% 2648 3 Deep Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2790 26 -25 855 72% 2625 4 Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2782 27 -26 750 67% 2654 5 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2772 27 -25 801 70% 2624 6 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2769 24 -24 898 66% 2655 7 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2759 22 -22 1043 65% 2649 8 Deep Junior 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2749 35 -33 439 64% 2644 9 Hiarcs 9.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2747 26 -26 744 61% 2667 10 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2744 29 -28 634 63% 2653 11 Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2725 22 -22 1033 62% 2642 12 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2723 31 -30 547 62% 2634 13 Chessmaster 9000 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2720 36 -36 376 55% 2682 14 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2719 30 -30 557 61% 2640 14 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2719 23 -22 983 58% 2659 16 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2718 30 -29 571 61% 2642 17 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2715 29 -29 583 58% 2656 18 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2702 24 -23 881 54% 2674 19 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2699 34 -34 429 54% 2669 20 Rebel 12.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2691 34 -33 442 56% 2647 21 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2684 22 -22 996 53% 2663 22 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2679 29 -29 565 53% 2658 23 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2677 29 -29 590 60% 2606 24 Deep Sjeng 1.5a 256MB Athlon 1200 MH 2676 31 -31 493 52% 2664 25 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2666 34 -33 433 52% 2651 26 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2663 26 -26 739 50% 2661 27 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2660 31 -31 514 53% 2637 28 Deep Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2655 31 -31 498 53% 2637 29 Gandalf 5.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2648 44 -45 250 43% 2697 30 Gandalf 5.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2639 25 -25 758 55% 2606 31 Ruffian 2.0.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2620 54 -55 165 48% 2635
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.