Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Very Good Test Position For Dedicated Units

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 20:02:44 07/02/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 02, 2004 at 22:11:04, Bruce Humphrey wrote:

>On July 02, 2004 at 00:01:50, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>On July 01, 2004 at 22:55:30, Bruce Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>>On June 30, 2004 at 18:48:13, Mike Byrne wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 30, 2004 at 08:56:28, Daniel Jackson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[D]2r4k/ppqbpp1p/3p1npQ/3R4/2r1P1P1/2N2P2/PPP1N3/1K5R w
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I tested this position with the Mach III Master back in 1989, it took about
>>>>>1hr.09min. to find Rf5!! with the double threat of Rxf6! and Nd5!
>>>>>
>>>>>Daniel
>>>>
>>>>Pocket PC Genius                1:58
>>>>Pocket Grandmaster (Ruffian)  ~12:00
>>>>Pocket Fritz 2                ~31:20 (on the 12th ply )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dell Axim 590 Mhz (oc)
>>>
>>>Are you sure? You should be getting better results (I expect)! I thought genius
>>>2.1 for palm was the same soft (basically) than pocket pc genius? Either that,
>>>or it is true that Pocket PC (operating system) is a resources hog (in
>>>comparisson with palm and symbian)
>>>
>>>In my palm T3 (400 Mhz arm)
>>>-Hiarcs 9.32 palm:          depth 7, 23sec*
>>>-Genius 2.1 (arm):          depth 8, 01:44 , 61880 n/sec
>>>-Tiger 15.1:                depth 8, 04:33**
>>>
>>>*- Hiarcs does 'see it' at 18sec, but doesn't select the move until 23 sec
>>>
>>>**- In Tiger depth 8, at 180 sec Rf6 is move 31/51. Then at 232 sec it gives it
>>>a ! (meaning it has discovered it is a lot better than previously thought) and
>>>it ends selecting it at 273 sec
>>>
>>>Bruce Humphrey
>>
>>in Genius hashsize matters a lot, tell me what hashsize you ran it at and I will
>>rerun the  test.
>
>Didn't know hashsize was so important for genius!
>
>I have 8Mb Hash Table, maximum I can set for my palm T3.
>
>got same time again with 8Mb, 01:44
>
>Tested it with 256Kb Hash:
>it searches same nodes per second, more or less, but... takes longer:
>-02:02 62742/sec
>
>Bruce Humphrey


I did a soft reset and it solved it in 1:35 w/8Mb hash.  I normally do not reset
the unit - it can run for weeks without doing one - but it is almost always
faster after I do the reset.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.