Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: pawn hash

Author: Daniel Shawul

Date: 22:14:09 07/02/04

Go up one level in this thread

On July 03, 2004 at 01:00:59, Tor Lattimore wrote:

>Hi.
>I'm implementing a pawn hash in my program, I'm wondering what sort of size it
>should be compared to the main transpos table? I'm assuming it can be *alot*
>smaller, any stats on how much smaller is good?
>cheers
>Tor

1 Meg is more than enough for a pawn hash. Making it larger will not
profit you much.

daniel

• Re: pawn hash Robert Hyatt 04:07:49 07/03/04
• Re: pawn hash Daniel Shawul 22:22:06 07/02/04
• Re: pawn hash Tor Lattimore 22:19:25 07/02/04
  • Re: pawn hash Dan Honeycutt 22:51:57 07/02/04
    • Re: pawn hash Pham Hong Nguyen 07:54:08 07/03/04
    • Re: pawn hash Tor Lattimore 23:42:59 07/02/04
    • Re: pawn hash Dan Andersson 23:27:33 07/02/04
      • Re: pawn hash Dan Honeycutt 00:24:15 07/03/04
        • Re: pawn hash Tor Lattimore 00:27:30 07/03/04
      • Some Results Tor Lattimore 00:03:37 07/03/04
        • Re: Some Results Dan Honeycutt 01:02:09 07/03/04
          • Re: Some Results Tor Lattimore 02:19:07 07/03/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.