Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 18:08:21 07/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2004 at 20:27:35, Mathieu Pagé wrote: >On July 05, 2004 at 17:19:29, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 05, 2004 at 13:37:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 05, 2004 at 13:24:48, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 05, 2004 at 13:15:25, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 05, 2004 at 13:10:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 05, 2004 at 13:08:00, Thomas Logan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Depite Falcons earlier lead Diep picks up the win >>>>> >>>> >>>>My subject is not as big as the hardware Diep is using :-) >>>> >>>>PS: I just like to have fun, you simply take it too serious :-) >>> >>>Arturo since you have been testing diep, give us your assessment of diep in >>>comparison to Crafty on equal hardware :-) >>> >>>Jorge >> >>It would be imprudent and irresponsible on my behalf if I began to compare the >>achievements, performance, efficiency and other aspects. It is too early to draw >>conclusions. >> >>However, I think the engine´s Authors have worked very hardly and the >>competition is not easy. Perhaps, the Opening Preparation could be decisive or >>the endgame level of the engines. Let´s leave the Tournament continues and the >>games can draw the direction of the conclusions. > > >Yes, Diep's author will have tons of reason to explain poor results. I don't see any so far. Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.