Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Limit extensions

Author: Eric Oldre

Date: 11:05:24 07/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 06, 2004 at 13:19:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>With fractional extensions, I believe it works best like this:
>
>extended=0;
>if (something) extended+=ext1;
>if (something_else) extended+=ext2;
>...
>etc.
>...
>
>extended=Max(extended,one_ply);
>
>If you extend more than one ply you run the risk of reaching a position where
>your search will be non-terminating.  Your code runs the risk of not extending
>enough.  IE if your first extension is one ply and the last above is 1/2 ply, if
>the 1/2 ply extension is triggered, that is all you will extend.  Add 'em up and
>limit them to 1 ply total should be better...
>

Robert,
I have heard you mention before that you limit extending to one ply. What I've
never been clear on is do you limit the extension to one ply for the entire
search? or to extending only one ply per node?

ie. if you are calling Search from the root with depth 10, is the maximun number
of plys it will look ahead 11? or could it be more if you have criteria for an
extension on multiply plys?

Eric



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.