Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz bad luck

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 15:30:43 07/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 06, 2004 at 17:21:58, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On July 06, 2004 at 17:19:23, James T. Walker wrote:
>
>>On July 06, 2004 at 15:25:18, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>>On July 06, 2004 at 15:06:07, Franz Hagra wrote:
>>>
>>>>Last year in Graz: Buggy Shredder wins last round with the help of the operator!
>>>>Then losing with a pawn up in the tiebreak game and now a bug and the end of the
>>>>dreams of the Fritz team.
>>>>
>>>>Hagra
>>>
>>>
>>>What has this to do with anything? FRITZ is state of the art exactly because it
>>>must not win at championships. It's participating, yes, but it must not prove
>>>anything at all. You can compare it with the EU soccer championship. Italy,
>>>Germany, Holland, France, England are NOT suddenly second class teams!! Just
>>>because they were satisfied with helping Czechia, Portugal and Greece to come
>>>through. It's all about marketing, if you know what I mean.
>>>
>>>As long as almost all teams are playing with shoes from ADIDAS or PUMA and
>>>shirts as well, all is in order.
>>>
>>>You know when the Soviet Icehockey team was almost unbeatable they lost a game
>>>here or there, just to support their sport as such. And the World-wide
>>>enthusiasm.
>>>
>>>This is called sports politics.
>>>
>>>
>>>Here in this year's WCCC it is important to prove that such a 10 round race is a
>>>neccessity! We are not through yet. Fritz will come back through wins over
>>>weaker programs and then in the end everybody has seen that if the race had been
>>>shorter, say 5 rounds, which would be sufficient IMO, that then Fritz wouldn't
>>>have had a chance. This is what's it's all about... All IMO!
>>
>>Perhaps you would like to see a 1 round championship?  If Fritz comes back to
>>win this then maybe it only proves that Fritz was actually the strongest
>>program.  Or maybe it only proves that with many rounds you have time for the
>>good luck and bad luck to equal out.  Or maybe it's all luck and programming
>>excellence is only a sidebar.  Or maybe you believe the whole thing is just a
>>conspiracy by Chessbase to prove the world is not really round.  If you go too
>>far to the left you will fall off the world.
>>Jim
>
>
>Jimmy,
>just ask Bob and you know that I'm correct with my 5 round optimum.

Well I think 10/11 rounds are too much but I would not complain about it.  I
also believe that the more rounds you have the better chance of the strongest
program winning.  In either case luck plays a part in it (good/bad).  I guess
you can stop it right now and give Junior the title but why not have some more
fun?
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.