Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 07:07:24 12/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 1998 at 09:08:48, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Dear david: >I agree with you. All the examples yuou have given to me are related to personal >attacks of one sort or another and that, of course, cannot be accepted. In fact, >I saw the war in RGCC about Indonesia and what did of it a nightmare were NOT >the reasons, arguments, data, etc given about it, BUT the personal attacks >between the people engaged in the debate. The problem is, once again, the >tendence to attack and this one you can meet een in purely chess computer >discussion. So, the problem is not the content of thge thread, but the attitude, >the prdominance of ego considerations, the fool idea that if you stop to answer >a post it's equal to resign your position in a public confrontation. EGO is the >sin, here as elsewhere. And that we are not going to cure just restricting the >issue to this or that stuff. I prefer a nice, witty discussion about beer that a >hotted, unpleasant and personalized discussion about programs. >By the eay, anyway, I agree with your attitude in 98% and that's reason I voted >for you with Larry T. and another guy. >Be lucky and merry christmas >fernando From my personal point of view - I could - and do - nicely tolerate " off topics " - it ain't that sure at all, what's a " topic " or not - lots of personal influences + sights might be involved. The REAL point for me - where all tolerancy ends - is the mean behaviour of the mentioned kinds....this counts....... Eh - off topic : Merry Christmas + a sacred New Year, Fernando D.P. a.k.a. ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.