Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 08:36:34 07/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2004 at 08:19:45, Daniel Clausen wrote: >I guess I speak for everyone here, when I say that we never intended to >critize/attack Omid personally here. exactly. > The critic was for/against the ICGA. I >agree that one could have done that more constructive (not to mention my stupid >post before, sorry for that) but, please try to understand that for >CC-enthusiasts it can be very depressing to not get any information. :) the thing is that this repeats year after year. and the same people make the same mistakes again and again. Do they even have a computer ? do they have internet ? do they speak english ?? it seems they have no computer, no internet and don't understand english. if they would organise the pig chamionship in the netherlands it would maybe be accurate enough not to use the internet. but this is a computerchess championship. was it different in paris 1997 ? is it different today ? same people. same misorganisation. we should collect money that they can buy themselves a computer. but the hotel has - nevertheless a swimming pool. that counts of course. swimming is more important than computerchess. >(2) >The real-time games moves. :) >Again, I don't think that the problem lies on the technical side. There are many >ways to make the game-moves available in almost real-time for _everyone_. The >issue _to me_ seems to be that the ICGA doesn't really want right :-)) they don't want to be disturbed by the people. that would make things complicate, wouldn't it ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.