Author: James T. Walker
Date: 15:36:19 07/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2004 at 14:01:25, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On July 08, 2004 at 13:35:44, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 08, 2004 at 13:04:32, Dan Simmons wrote: >> >>>So, what's at stake? >>> >>>I propose the losing author make a sincere written apology at this site praising >>>the other author's greatness. After all, nothing ventured, nothing gained. >> >> >>Neither Bob Hyatt nor Vincent Diepeveen have to apologize. I think both engines >>have the possibility to finish the Tourmament in good shape. > >You missed the idea. The "sincere" apology is just a way of paying off a fun >bet. It would add greater interest to the contest. Nobody with any sense thinks >that a single game actually proves anything. > >> >>Just one game. Another pairing. Why, guys, are you not able to enjoy the >>Tournament? Nobody with any sense would think an apology by either would be "sincere". :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.