Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:21:33 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 08:33:38, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 07:16:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 09, 2004 at 07:12:31, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2004 at 06:59:05, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>Crafty show advantage of 1-2 pawns with black and diep in time trouble >>>>I heard Vincent complaining that Crafty never does the expected moves. >>>> >>>>It seems that there is going to be another original excuse for diep failures. >>> >>>It sounds more to me that another person is doing a said attempt to stir up >>>things again. >>> >>>The first 2 lines make sense, Diep is in time trouble because Crafty doesn't >>>play the expected moves. Your additional lines doesn't have anything to do with >>>it. >>> >>>Please limit yourself to excuses for Movei. >>> >>>Tony >> >>I did not claim that movei is stronger than Crafty or Diep so I do not need to >>make excuses for movei. >> >>Movei on the tournament hardware is certainly significantly weaker than Diep on >>4 opterons. >> >>Uri > >Who has been giving excuses all the day about Movei? Accept at one that Movei >lost, instead of, finding excuses about that other engines could not avoid Qxg7 >or so. > >Today, Crafty won. > >So, what is the relation between the Today Diep game and the way how you lost >against Diep? I do not understand your point. There is no relation between Movei-Diep and Diep-Crafty. The relation is between Diep-Crafty 0-1 and previous posts of Vincent(see another post of me). Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.