Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 06:25:23 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 09:16:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 08:38:43, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 09, 2004 at 08:30:45, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2004 at 06:59:05, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>Crafty show advantage of 1-2 pawns with black and diep in time trouble >>>>I heard Vincent complaining that Crafty never does the expected moves. >>>> >>>>It seems that there is going to be another original excuse for diep failures. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Uri, it is a fact that Diep beated pretty easily Movei. I was online and I >>>looking the game and I did not see Diepeveen saying anything. > >This is not the point >I usually do not say that people who lose will have another excuse after the >game. >The point is that Vincent never apologized about previous behaviour when he >attacked Crafty and call it primitive evaluation and it is only one of many >attacks. > >If I read Vincent apologizing about his behaviour I will not try to joke about >Vincent's loses. > >Treating other people in the way that was done by Vincent can cause people to >joke about Vincent's losses. > Then, we can create a joined reaction. Must I laught about your lost games and the level displayed by your engine? Of course, no. I remember that I asked you a direct question about Movei and I did not laugh. The facts that you joke (very bad jokes) about some engine, it is not a better attitude that the Diepeveen´s bahavior. So what is your point? >>> >>>What is more, Vincent told me that Peter Berger had done a very good work with >>>the Crafty Book. So, I do not understand your behavior. >>> >>>Yesterday, you lost. Today, I do not know. Crafty played a better endgame and >>>won. Good for Crafty. >>> >>>So, what is your point? >> >>If we speak about bad losers. We can refer to all your messages. "The Machine >>crashing", "Arena is not a good gui", etc....... > >1)Machine crashing is a report about what happened and I do not claim that movei >could score better without it. >Giving the information may be productive because maybe some people will help >me with good advice how to prevent it. > >2)Arena was not an excuse and I never claimed that it changed the result. >I simply did not like the fact that I could not see movei draw decleration. > >I noticed the draw by repetition by myself and wondered why I could not see it >in movei decleration and only after looking again in the screen I found that the >decleration is in another place in the screen and is a decleration of arena. > >Note that I could see movei draw decleration in the logfile later. >In winboard I never saw the same problem and winboard give the engines to play >including draw by repetition claims. > Instead of filling all the Forum with excuses, we must accept when we loose a game. Today, Diep lost. Yesterday, Diep beated Movei easily. Again, I dont see Diepeveen filling all the forum with excuses. So what is your point? > > >> >>I do not see Diepeveen filling this Forum with excuses. Instead, you..... are >>plenly of excuses...... >> >>What is your point? > >All the programs that beated movei are stronger than movei and I did not claim >the opposite. > >Vincent claimed in the past that Diep is better than Crafty and even claimed >that Crafty has primitive evaluation and as far as I know he never apologized >about it. > >Uri Again, what is the relation of this issue with the game between Diep and Movei???????? What is your point? Can your order your ideas?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.