Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why Fritz has to play against FIBIChess (for E.Nemeth)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:59:06 07/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 09, 2004 at 02:23:28, Amir Ban wrote:

>On July 08, 2004 at 17:06:20, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 08, 2004 at 16:59:07, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>On July 08, 2004 at 16:50:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 08, 2004 at 16:30:07, Ingo Althofer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On July 08, 2004 at 15:07:14, Anson T J wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>WCCC  2004 Cross Table After Round 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  0  1  2  3  4
>>>>>>1 Deep JuniorEY     *  ½  1  ½        1     1     1             5.0/6
>>>>>>2 Shredder          ½  *     ½  1  ½  1     ½                   4.0/6
>>>>>>3 Deep Sjeng        0     *     ½  ½     1  ½        1          3.5/6  11.00
>>>>>>4 Jonny 2.64        ½  ½     *        ½  0     1        1       3.5/6  10.25
>>>>>>5 ParSOS               0  ½     *        ½     ½  1  1          3.5/6  9.75
>>>>>>6 Fritz                ½  ½        *     0  1  ½        1       3.5/6  9.50
>>>>>>7 Diep              0  0     ½        *  1           1  1       3.5/6  9.25
>>>>>>8 Falcon Bar-Ilan         0  1  ½  1  0  *                 1    3.5/6  8.75
>>>>>>9 Crafty 19.15      0  ½  ½        0        *  1           1    3.0/6
>>>>>>0 ISIChess                   0  ½  ½        0  *  ½        1    2.5/6  4.75
>>>>>>1 WoodPusher 1997   0           0              ½  *  ½  ½  1    2.5/6  3.25
>>>>>>2 Movei                   0     0     0           ½  *  1  1    2.5/6  2.75
>>>>>>3 The Crazy Bishop           0     0  0           ½  0  *  1    1.5/6
>>>>>>4 FIBIChess                              0  0  0  0  0  0  *    0.0/6
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for the good presentation.
>>>>>
>>>>>And now it becomes clear, why Fritz has to play against FIBIChess:
>>>>>FIBI has played already against all on ranks 8 to 13... and Fritz is on
>>>>>shared rank 3 to 8.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ingo Althofer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This obviously caused by _way_ too many rounds for 14 participants.  It will
>>>>almost end up a round robin, lacking only two games to make that happen...
>>>
>>>I don't see why this particular pairing is caused by the large number of rounds.
>>>If there were only 7 rounds instead of 11, wouldn't the pairings up to this
>>>point be exactly the same? Does the pairing program take into account the number
>>>of rounds?
>>
>>No.  The point is that the top programs have _already_ played.  Now all that can
>>be done is to pair them down.
>>
>
>A glance at the cross-table shows that this is not true. There are still many
>games missing among the top 8. E.g. Rank 2 & 3 have not played yet.
>
>Amir

The "top eight" really doesn't matter.  I was specifically referring to Junior,
Shredder and Fritz...

They were the obvious picks to win.  They've played.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.