Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 07:20:12 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 09:21:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 08:33:38, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 09, 2004 at 07:16:57, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2004 at 07:12:31, Tony Werten wrote: >>> >>>>On July 09, 2004 at 06:59:05, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>Crafty show advantage of 1-2 pawns with black and diep in time trouble >>>>>I heard Vincent complaining that Crafty never does the expected moves. >>>>> >>>>>It seems that there is going to be another original excuse for diep failures. >>>> >>>>It sounds more to me that another person is doing a said attempt to stir up >>>>things again. >>>> >>>>The first 2 lines make sense, Diep is in time trouble because Crafty doesn't >>>>play the expected moves. Your additional lines doesn't have anything to do with >>>>it. >>>> >>>>Please limit yourself to excuses for Movei. >>>> >>>>Tony >>> >>>I did not claim that movei is stronger than Crafty or Diep so I do not need to >>>make excuses for movei. >>> >>>Movei on the tournament hardware is certainly significantly weaker than Diep on >>>4 opterons. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Who has been giving excuses all the day about Movei? Accept at one that Movei >>lost, instead of, finding excuses about that other engines could not avoid Qxg7 >>or so. >> >>Today, Crafty won. >> >>So, what is the relation between the Today Diep game and the way how you lost >>against Diep? I do not understand your point. > >There is no relation between Movei-Diep and Diep-Crafty. > >The relation is between Diep-Crafty 0-1 and previous posts of Vincent(see >another post of me). > >Uri Uri, I dont see messages from Vincent. I only see a lot of messages with excuses about your lost games. Could you explain what you are talking about?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.