Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:55:34 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 10:27:41, Tord Romstad wrote:
>I haven't studied the Diep-Crafty game very closely, but didn't Diep have a
>clear advantage out of the opening?
>
>Tord
Crafty was very close to zero (equal).
Diep played the unusual cxd4 in the QGD, and at move 10 the search looked like
this, which seems reasonable for black (+=good for white):
14-> 3:06 0.13 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Qxe7 12. Nge2
Rac8 13. O-O a5 14. Bh7+ Kh8 15. Nf4
Qg5 16. Nxe6 fxe6 17. Qg6 Qxg6 18.
Bxg6 Rf6 19. Bd3 (s=4)
15 4:42 0.18 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Nxe7 12. Nf3 c5
13. dxc5 Nxc5 14. O-O Rc8 15. Nd4 Nxd3
16. Qxd3 Nc6 17. Nxc6 bxc6 18. b4 Qf6
19. Rad1 (s=3)
White(10): Bd3
predicted move made.
time=8:30 cpu=381% mat=0 n=3605721021 fh=91% nps=7.06M
ext-> chk=49152115 cap=11175543 pp=403506 1rep=5138585 mate=103349
predicted=7 nodes=3605721021 evals=1694805804 50move=2
endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
SMP-> split=23293 stop=3633 data=19/128 cpu=34:00 elap=8:30
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.