Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 08:06:03 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 10:55:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 10:27:41, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>I haven't studied the Diep-Crafty game very closely, but didn't Diep have a >>clear advantage out of the opening? >> >>Tord > >Crafty was very close to zero (equal). > >Diep played the unusual cxd4 in the QGD, and at move 10 the search looked like >this, which seems reasonable for black (+=good for white): > > > > > > 14-> 3:06 0.13 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Qxe7 12. Nge2 > Rac8 13. O-O a5 14. Bh7+ Kh8 15. Nf4 > Qg5 16. Nxe6 fxe6 17. Qg6 Qxg6 18. > Bxg6 Rf6 19. Bd3 (s=4) > 15 4:42 0.18 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Nxe7 12. Nf3 c5 > 13. dxc5 Nxc5 14. O-O Rc8 15. Nd4 Nxd3 > 16. Qxd3 Nc6 17. Nxc6 bxc6 18. b4 Qf6 > 19. Rad1 (s=3) >White(10): Bd3 >predicted move made. > time=8:30 cpu=381% mat=0 n=3605721021 fh=91% nps=7.06M > ext-> chk=49152115 cap=11175543 pp=403506 1rep=5138585 mate=103349 > predicted=7 nodes=3605721021 evals=1694805804 50move=2 > endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0 > SMP-> split=23293 stop=3633 data=19/128 cpu=34:00 elap=8:30 What did Crafty think around moves 25--30? That's when I thought Crafty was in serious trouble. Perhaps I was wrong ... Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.