Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:37:14 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 11:06:03, Tord Romstad wrote:
>On July 09, 2004 at 10:55:34, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 09, 2004 at 10:27:41, Tord Romstad wrote:
>>
>>>I haven't studied the Diep-Crafty game very closely, but didn't Diep have a
>>>clear advantage out of the opening?
>>>
>>>Tord
>>
>>Crafty was very close to zero (equal).
>>
>>Diep played the unusual cxd4 in the QGD, and at move 10 the search looked like
>>this, which seems reasonable for black (+=good for white):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 14-> 3:06 0.13 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Qxe7 12. Nge2
>> Rac8 13. O-O a5 14. Bh7+ Kh8 15. Nf4
>> Qg5 16. Nxe6 fxe6 17. Qg6 Qxg6 18.
>> Bxg6 Rf6 19. Bd3 (s=4)
>> 15 4:42 0.18 10. ... Nd7 11. Bxe7 Nxe7 12. Nf3 c5
>> 13. dxc5 Nxc5 14. O-O Rc8 15. Nd4 Nxd3
>> 16. Qxd3 Nc6 17. Nxc6 bxc6 18. b4 Qf6
>> 19. Rad1 (s=3)
>>White(10): Bd3
>>predicted move made.
>> time=8:30 cpu=381% mat=0 n=3605721021 fh=91% nps=7.06M
>> ext-> chk=49152115 cap=11175543 pp=403506 1rep=5138585 mate=103349
>> predicted=7 nodes=3605721021 evals=1694805804 50move=2
>> endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
>> SMP-> split=23293 stop=3633 data=19/128 cpu=34:00 elap=8:30
>
>
>What did Crafty think around moves 25--30? That's when I thought Crafty
>was in serious trouble. Perhaps I was wrong ...
>
>Tord
At move 25:
13-> 21.54 -0.57 25. ... Na5 26. Qxb5 b6 27. Ra2 Bh3
28. Rac2 Rd7 29. Rc3 Qf3 30. Ne1 Qg4
31. hxg5 hxg5 32. Ng2 (s=2)
14 29.67 -0.55 25. ... Na5 26. Qxb5 b6 27. Ra2 Rd7
28. Rac2 Qe6 29. hxg5 hxg5 30. e4 Bf3
31. Qa6 Re7 32. exd5 Qh3
14-> 1:00 -0.55 25. ... Na5 26. Qxb5 b6 27. Ra2 Rd7
28. Rac2 Qe6 29. hxg5 hxg5 30. e4 Bf3
31. Qa6 Re7 32. exd5 Qh3 (s=4)
15 1:21 -0.48 25. ... Na5 26. Qxb5 b6 27. Ra2 Rd7
28. Rac2 Kg7 29. hxg5 hxg5 30. f4 Kg8
31. Rf2 Bh3 32. Rff1 Rd6 <HT> (s=3)
15 3:08 -0.53 25. ... Rd6 26. Qxb5 b6 27. Rc3 Nd8
28. Bf1 Ne6 29. a4 Nc5 30. a5 Ne4 31.
Rc2 Qf5 32. axb6 Rxb6 33. Qd3 (s=2)
time=3:08 cpu=398% mat=-1 n=1638017929 fh=92% nps=8.68M
ext-> chk=32115487 cap=4710576 pp=445689 1rep=2336686 mate=200552
predicted=14 nodes=1638017929 evals=468450030 50move=1
endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
SMP-> split=21651 stop=2923 data=21/128 cpu=12:32 elap=3:08
(-=good for black here).
at move 30:
15-> 53.58 -0.17 30. ... Re8 31. Rc3 Ree6 32. Qd2 Re7
33. Qd1 Kg7 34. Bb5 Re4 35. Qc2 Ree6
36. Ne1 <HT> (s=16)
White(30): qb2
predicted move made.
time=2:27 cpu=399% mat=0 n=1240084627 fh=91% nps=8.40M
ext-> chk=26643621 cap=4094087 pp=355049 1rep=1927263 mate=103900
predicted=17 nodes=1240084627 evals=386816774 50move=3
endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
SMP-> split=5671 stop=759 data=17/128 cpu=9:49 elap=2:27
and at move 35:
14 27.52 -0.24 35. ... Nb4 36. Bh7+ Kh8 37. Qb2 Nc6
38. Bd3 Qf6 39. Qd2 Kg8 40. Qd1 Re7
41. Qh5 Re8 42. hxg5 hxg5 43. f4 <HT>
(s=5)
14-> 40.23 -0.24 35. ... Nb4 36. Bh7+ Kh8 37. Qb2 Nc6
38. Bd3 Qf6 39. Qd2 Kg8 40. Qd1 Re7
41. Qh5 Re8 42. hxg5 hxg5 43. f4 <HT>
(s=3)
15 51.76 -0.22 35. ... Nb4 36. Bh7+ Kh8 37. Qb2 Nc6
38. Bd3 Qf6 39. Bb5 Qf5 40. Bd3 Qg4
41. a5 bxa5 42. Qb7 Nb4 43. Qxc7 Nxd3
44. Rxd3 (s=2)
time=1:57 cpu=398% mat=0 n=979502008 fh=91% nps=8.31M
ext-> chk=19915443 cap=3044558 pp=245246 1rep=1192356 mate=32297
predicted=20 nodes=979502008 evals=313362541 50move=14
endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
SMP-> split=15071 stop=1960 data=21/128 cpu=7:49 elap=1:57
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.