Author: Scott Gasch
Date: 13:16:59 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 15:27:19, Richard Pijl wrote: >There are some really difficult positions in PET. The Baron scores between 28-32 >solved positions depending on the version (on a Xeon 2.8, 100Mb hash, all 5 men >EGTB's). It happens a lot that performance on PET degrades, but on other endgame >suites the performance is better (e.g. the speelman suite from George Lyapko's >site, run without EGTB's) > >But 10 sounds very bad. I've got another engine, basically without anything >(only piece square tables, no hash, no egtb's, no advanced techniques, you name >it, it hasn't got it) and it solves 9 positions (could be for the wrong reason, >I haven't checked). In poor monsoon's defense, it's been lobotomized lately. I've implemented a parallel search and redone the eval from the ground up. It doesn't have very much at all in the way of endgame smarts currently -- not even pawn race code. Scott
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.