Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:55:27 07/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 16:10:36, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 15:28:04, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On July 09, 2004 at 14:57:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2004 at 11:50:46, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On July 09, 2004 at 11:48:15, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 09, 2004 at 11:17:45, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 09, 2004 at 10:51:57, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>you still can't get it. Let me explain. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You asked why people made jokes, or were laughing at Diepeveen, although Vincent >>>>>>>>didn't say a single word here in these days. Then these people answer you that >>>>>>>>this is true but that Vincent formerly always wnt on tangents and insulted >>>>>>>>Crafty and its author (will you deny that?) and THEREFORE they are NOW laughing >>>>>>>>at Diepeveen. It has nothing to do with what Vincent had said in the last two >>>>>>>>days or such. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Are you crazy or mad? I have not denied anything. Where is your head flying? My >>>>>>>position has always been against of laughing the people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Instead, I have been laughing and creating nonsense durin the las days on your >>>>>>>behalf. Thefore, what is your point? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Again, perhaps you learn to read: I dont underestimate the work of anybody, I >>>>>>>dont laugh about the work done by somebody. What do you have in your head? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>DIEP. But it's simply not good enough to be able to equalize the advantages of >>>>>>>>the three top programs. Perhaps next time. Your both ages speak in your favor. >>>>>>>>All others are much more old aged... The future is yours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Again, I have not attacked anybody. Why dont you know to read? Nobody is talking >>>>>>>about how good the "top" programs are. I was going to comment this specific game >>>>>>>between Diep and Crafty. and then you began with your garbage agian. What hell >>>>>>>do you com from? Why does your paranoid mind create flames everywhere? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Have you read what I have written here? There is no attacks there... What is >>>>>>>your obsession? I dont understand why your mind is filled with ghosts? Can you >>>>>>>write antyhing with any sense? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Your language betrays you. You've not attacked Uri, I see. <ggg> >>>>> >>>>>Not really. If you begin a war you can expect reactions. If you respect, you >>>>>will be respected. You dont still understand the point. >>>> >>>>I dont attack Uri. I said: What is the relation between the Diepeveen's topic >>>>and the Movei games? >>>> >>>>??????? The relation belongs to other dimension????? ;))) >>> >>> >>>Here is a sample from ICC, just written by Vincent. This gives you an idea of >>>the kind of comments Uri was talking about: >>> >>>quote on------------------------ >>>DIEP(C)(64): so it was another show that you can only lose to crafty when you >>>play real bad >>>quote off----------------------- >>> >>>That was when someone asked him about his "endgame problem" in today's game. >>> >>>It's that kind of continual misinformation and put-down that earns him so much >>>rancor here. When I lost to Junior, I simply said "I got out-played". No "The >>>only way Junior could win was if I played terribly.." >>> >>>Note that I didn't take part in the above ICC channel 64 discussion and did not >>>respond or comment in any way. Seemed totally pointless to do so... >> >> >>You're wasting your time, Bob. See at the vocabulary of this friend of >>Diepeveen. And about Vincent you must only know that he accused people of having >>commited *fraud* [!] but when asked Vincent could show any bit of evidence. So >>both, the language of DIEP people sucks and their logic too. Here I tell Arturo >>that Albert had made a satirical comment, instead of reflecting what that could >>mean he suddenly begins to insult me for being all kind from "lunatic" to >>"paranoid". And that on CCC! The same now where I tried to defend Uri. Confusion >>all over, wherever you take a look. What can you expect? The least I can say >>about what VD is talking on ICC - that is dishonest. And you still remain calm? >>And give him advice for his program? I can't understand you. ;) > >While you critize my vocabulary, you should not be criticizing so much. I am >really fed up about your satirical innocence. You are very know for your low >sort comment. What you did not expect is somebody reacts in the same tone yours. > >While a majority could ignore your attitude, you got me fed up. Depending on how >you change your attitude, I could change the tone of my replies till your >person. > >Again, you began with all this flame some days ago. Arturo, please give me exact message number where I should have done something you took offense with. I have no reason not to apologize if that should be the case. But actually I don't know what you are talking about. All I did was explaining in the discussion with you and Albert Silver. I said that it was a satire what he had written. But you didn't understand. That's all what I wrote. Of course I defended later against your insults. So please give me that number so that I can react if necessary. And I promise you I will apologize if you are right. - But if you're wrong i expect that you apologize. Ok? > Understand what you dont >understand: If you don't respect, dont expect to be respected. Respect yourserlf >so people might think (although doubtfully) that you could change your attitude. >I doubt it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.