Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 19:34:25 12/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 1998 at 13:34:47, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On December 23, 1998 at 04:47:09, Komputer Korner wrote: > >>It seems that I was wrong in calling CM6000 a toy program. The reason is that it >>is possible to become a chess master (up to 2300 rating) without going over >>one's played games in player player mode (with or without a computer)and without >>using an opening book editor. The fact that CM6000 doesn't have these features >>should in no way preclude those who aspire to be a chess master from buying it. >>In fact see my revised article below after the 2nd patch. It wins Gold Medal >>awards all around. However the consensus from FIDE masters and IMs seems to be >>that even though you can reach master level chess by not studying your own >>games, if you want to reach higher than that you must start to study your own >>played games. So Mr. Dorr I truly apologize to you and the other masters I >>slighted and it seems all the chess schools that advocate studying one's games >>were really talking to masters that want to reach the IM and GM levels. We have >>all learned something here and again I hope you accept my apology. >>-- >>Komputer Korner >>the now humble inkompetent komputer I remember spotting all this to you more than 3 weeks ago - as I just did a CM 6.000 review - just as you. At that time you didn't even answer - not to speak about overthinking my arguments and maybe figure them as somehow correct. Conclusion out of this - it needs a certain kind of name or position to be respected by you, in the meaning of giving a worthwhile - to overthink argument ? Merry Christmas - D.P. a.k.a. ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.