Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:51:58 07/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2004 at 21:29:04, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On July 09, 2004 at 21:21:44, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>Ok, Arturo, listen, >> >>I will contact the mods tomorrow and I will ask them what messages they had >>deleted and then we will see if I wrote what you claimed this "are you really >>Omid" etc. I didn't write such things. >> >>Again the mods deleted a thread from both of us where you had attacked me for my >>rgcc past and where I defended and explained how the past really was. BTW all >>could be read in Google. >> >>Here you continue your insults what proves that one cannot debate rationally >>with the Diep people. > >Where are the insults? I have to repeat one thing 5 times since you dont want to >read what I am explaining. Dear Arturo, you ask where the insults are? And you think you can hide it because some messages were deleted indeed? And you also hope that you can claim whatever you wanted if you know that a message was deleted? Claim of anything that could have been written in such a deleted message? - This is very wrong, Arturo. Here is a little quote of the very beginning of our dispute. You had answered on Albert S. Read what you have written to him. This is a 100% insult. Now, what I was doing, was simply to explain to you how that was insulting. But you didn't want to listen and insulted me with almost the same pseudo psychiatry. This is maybe for you an allowed pattern in a debatge, but in real this is insultive. Just read yourself the following quote and make up your mind if you had the right to insult these people. I don't think so. Arturo to Albert: People with pathologies of inferiority is real problem here. Go to the asylum, please. Rolf to Arturo: I didn't know that you are a book author _and_ psychologist. Albert was never in danger to hide inferiority complexes with a low-levelled insulting vocabulary... However I know some cases as a professional psychologist! WHERE WAS HERE THE INSULT?? Arturo to Rolf (this time even a bigger inslut than to Albert): Finally the two pieces of horror have gotten together. There must be a jailbreak from the asylum. THIS WAS INSULTIVEE AND INHUMAN (calling human beings "pieces") Rolf to Arturo (this time really sarcastic!): Self-knowledge is the first step to self-improvement. I will consider that positively in my final judgements about you. Arturo to Rolf: It is impossible to deal with mental insanes. Of course, hopefully, you will be jailed again in your asylum asap. THIS IS AGAIN EXTREMLY INSULTIVE (terms like jail, asylum, mental insane) Rolf to Arturo: Since when are you allowed to deal with human beings? In my case I'm officially allowed for over 25 years right now. Approximately since your birthday... Just let it go, Artur. Let's just respect each other. (This is a calm and knowledgable answer. Nothing insultive etc.) So, Arturo, do you see where the insults came from? And who just reacted with a smiling sarcasm? I think you can't deny that you brought the insults into the debate. > >You have all these flame for 5 days and now you pretend that I am calm. Come on, >sir. What kind of person can be so patient with your person? > >Let´s continue the concert. I am ready in any level.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.