Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A new Swedish list is out.

Author: blass uri

Date: 07:23:21 12/25/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 25, 1998 at 09:27:41, Bert Seifriz wrote:

>THE SSDF RATING LIST 1998-12-24 63528 games played by 186 computers
>
>                                             Rating + - Games Won Oppo
>
>                                            ------ --- --- ----- --- ----
>
>1 Fritz 5.0 PB30% 67MB P200 MMX               2566 25 -24 906 68% 2431
>2 Junior 5.0 64MB P200 MMX                    2556 33 -31 502 67% 2435
>3 Nimzo 98 56MB P200 MMX                      2526 25 -24 812 61% 2450
>4 Rebel 9.0 45MB P200 MMX                     2524 25 -25 802 63% 2432
>5 Hiarcs 6.0 46MB P200 MMX                    2523 26 -26 720 58% 2464
>6 MChess Pro 7.1 38MB P200 MMX                2512 27 -26 714 59% 2447
>7 Rebel 8.0 45MB P200 MMX                     2507 32 -31 493 59% 2440
>8 MChess Pro 6.0 40MB P200 MMX                2505 29 -28 599 58% 2449
>9 Shredder 2.0 56MB P200 MMX                  2502 27 -27 679 57% 2453
>10 Genius 5.0 DOS 41MB P200 MMX               2496 25 -25 788 58% 2438
>11 MChess Pro 8.0 64MB P200 MMX               2482 35 -34 414 57% 2434
>12 Gandalf 3.0 64MB P200 MMX                  2467 41 -40 307 59% 2399
>13 Kallisto II 64MB P200 MMX                  2445 35 -35 398 52% 2429
>14 Rebel 9.0 Pentium 90 MHz                   2442 27 -27 672 51% 2437
>15 Rebel 8.0 Pentium 90 MHz                   2439 19 -19 1331 57% 2393
>16 Hiarcs 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz                  2438 20 -20 1197 54% 2412
>17 Hiarcs 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz                  2427 39 -38 343 61% 2351
>
>First 17! Bert/gambitsoft.com

Where did you get the all list?

I looked at the link in gambitsoft for the ssdf list and they tell me only the
previous list.

There are some strange results

There is a big difference between the rating of Mchesspro8 in this list and in
the selective search list.

I also expected Junior5 to be number 1 in the list.

It was not number 1 in the previous list only because of a mistake in the match
against Rebel8(P90) when Junior5 was slower and they repeat 4 games and Junior5
won Rebel8(P90) 14.5:5.5 instead of 12.5:7.5

I saw here also good results for Junior5 (17.5:2.5 against against Fritz3(p90)
should help Junior5 to be number 1)

I did not see the games with bad results for Junior5.

I want to see them to check if there was not a mistake of a tester in these
games.

Uri

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.