Author: blass uri
Date: 08:03:25 12/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 1998 at 16:13:09, Jim Paul wrote: >This is related to my previous CM6000 posting. >What would most people regard as the typical rating improvement in blitz >compared to standard time controls for most PC chess programs these days? > >I know it heavily depends on whether the program is mainly a "heavy calculator" >or a "knowledge based" program No, It is not truth Hiarcs7 is a "knowledge based" program and it is good at tactics and did very good results in blitz games , ie. I'd expect Rebel and Hiarcs to exhibit less >of a blitz rating increase (if any) compared to their standard 40/2 ratings (on >SSDF or Selective Search rating lists) for example. Whereas Fritz and probably >CM6000 would have higher ratings at blitz. CM6000 is not very strong at blitz and is better at longer time control. > >I'd expect CM6000 to play about 100 ELO points higher at blitz than it's SSDF >rating (when it gets one anyway !!). That would make it around 2550 at blitz ?! In other words you say that you expect chessmaster6000 to have 2450 at long time control. I expect chessmaster to have better results( more than 2550 ssdf rating with a chance to be number 1 in the ssdf list) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.