Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:50:00 07/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2004 at 07:33:51, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Hello all, > >in Graz we had the situation that suddenly when LIST was ahead of DIEP & SJENG >it was ordered that LIST should prove through his code that it wasn't a CRAFTY >clone. LIST was banned and therefore DIEP & SJENG were ahead of LIST again, >because LIST was forbidden to play on. > >Now after the 8th round in Bar-Ilan we have that same situation. This time a >program called C_R_A_F_T_Y is ahead of DIEP & SJENG. Ahead of everybody except >JUNIOR, SHREDDER & FRITZ. > >What will happen? Will Crafty lay open his source code to prove beyond >reasonable doubts that it's not a clone??? > >Tension increasing. How the TD will decide. Will something worse happen? > >Satire Wolf > >P.S. I was just informed that this time the Crafty clone question was met by >simply pairing the beast against all others with the Black pieces. (In German: >So Peter has the Schwarzen Peter!!) http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/7378/comphis.htm In 1981 CRAY BLITZ won the Mississipi State Championship with a perfect 5-0 score and a performance rating of 2258. In round 4 it defeated Joe Sentef (2262) to become the first computer to beat a master in tournament play and the first computer to gain a master rating (2258). Sorry Mr. Hyatt, but you have to admit it, crafty still have some old ideas from your original CRAY BLITZ project :-) Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.