Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 10:32:05 07/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2004 at 13:01:22, Sune Fischer wrote: > >Better yet is to show the calculations. > >By making a few almost realistic assumptions (e.g. the prng is perfect) it >shouldn't be hard to get a good lower bound for the collision rate. > >You may try the archives, I believe it's already been posted here a few times. > It certainly would be better with some calculations than to just say "Trust me" :) But I can't cover everything in my thesis. For many things I have to refer to other sources. This is the normal way of doing it. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.