Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 16:13:33 07/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2004 at 19:03:41, mike tubbs wrote: >On July 12, 2004 at 18:45:12, Rafael Vasquez wrote: > >>Give he a week to work with the hardware+software to use. >>If he gets to find a weakness, you can be sure he´ll beat them. >> >>He doesn´t PLAY better than the programs. >> >>His superior skill is to find WEAKNESS. >> >>He could play and lose a match, but when he finds a weakness he >>will beat ridicoulsly the program. >> >>But althought he is not a better player(lets say GM), you can be sure he is >>a strong chess player as well Master Level. > > Ok explained this way, it makes alot more sense, although i'm not sure I agree. >Surely he can't find weakness better then kasparov and Kramnick who actually had >the program for months before they played it, and still didn't manage to win the >match. Also there is a big difference between a pent 600 and a 4 processor >machine, don't you think that would make a big difference? Kasparov and Kramnik also played adventursome chess, with real risk, so that really makes the difference. If they played very ugly anti-computer chess, the spectators would lose interest very quickly.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.