Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 20:05:36 07/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2004 at 18:23:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 12, 2004 at 14:58:56, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 12, 2004 at 14:27:03, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 12, 2004 at 14:16:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 12, 2004 at 14:01:24, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 12, 2004 at 13:55:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>If these programs play at least 4 games against each other, I believe the >>>>>>outcome would be totally different. Any of these program is capable of winning >>>>>>if you match them in a long tourney of at least 36 games. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>PS: Let me rephrase what I meant, any of the first 5 programs can win in a >>>>longer match, since the bottom five would definitively help to change the >>>>outcome. >>>> >>> Another point that I would like to mention is that beside shredder and Deep >>>Junior occupying the first two positions, the remaining positions would >>>definitively be reversed. Such as Falcon and Deep SJeng could end up in 3th and >>>4th etc.. >>>>Jorge >>>> >> >>Then........ 1 + 3 = 2????!!!!!! What are you talking about? More nonsense? > >The first two position would never be anything else then Shredder, Deep Junior >if you take those lower rated programs. Lets face it, Diep was simply lucky to >end up in third, but it could NOT beat Crafty and it will not beat it in a match >of 30 games :-) > >Jorge I prefer not to answer this......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.