Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder 8 v CM9000 TO5 and CM9000 Assassin at 40/120

Author: Graham Banks

Date: 20:19:25 07/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On July 12, 2004 at 21:13:22, Graham Banks wrote:

>On July 12, 2004 at 19:39:19, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On July 12, 2004 at 19:27:35, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>Early days in my brother Ray's testing on a dual Athlon 2800:
>>>
>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 TO5  (9-2)
>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 Assassin   (13.5-6.5)
>>>
>>>Assassin is the strongest setting at long time controls that we could come up
>>>with.
>>>As I said, still early days in our testing. Much more to be done!
>>
>>With less than 30 games, neither result is worth reporting.
>
>That's why I said 'early days'!
>Graham.


One thing about these matches though is that we are using ponder off. When
Shredder 8 starts thinking it is using both processors whereas when CM9000 is
thinking it only uses one. I suspect that we need to set Shredder 8 up so that
it only uses a single processor in order to get a fair match. Your thoughts on
this would be appreciated.
Graham.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.