Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 22:09:53 07/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2004 at 23:19:25, Graham Banks wrote:
>On July 12, 2004 at 21:13:22, Graham Banks wrote:
>
>>On July 12, 2004 at 19:39:19, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On July 12, 2004 at 19:27:35, Graham Banks wrote:
>>>
>>>>Early days in my brother Ray's testing on a dual Athlon 2800:
>>>>
>>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 TO5 (9-2)
>>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 Assassin (13.5-6.5)
>>>>
>>>>Assassin is the strongest setting at long time controls that we could come up
>>>>with.
>>>>As I said, still early days in our testing. Much more to be done!
>>>
>>>With less than 30 games, neither result is worth reporting.
>>
>>That's why I said 'early days'!
>>Graham.
>
>
>One thing about these matches though is that we are using ponder off. When
>Shredder 8 starts thinking it is using both processors whereas when CM9000 is
>thinking it only uses one. I suspect that we need to set Shredder 8 up so that
>it only uses a single processor in order to get a fair match. Your thoughts on
>this would be appreciated.
>Graham.
Hi Graham
Oops: this is of course a big disadavantage for all
opponents of Shredder 8. On the other hand you seem
to play with Deep Shredder which is not the same.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.