Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 22:29:43 07/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2004 at 19:58:20, Amir Ban wrote: >Among the rest, Diep deserves mention. It had a good result, and there is >obvious talent invested there, but the inconsistency that always characterized >it was apparent in this tournament too. There is a FAQ in computer chess of >whether it helps if the programmer is a good chess player. My answer (strictly >IMO) is probably unexpected: It hurts. When you are a good player, you tend to >think about the problem in all the wrong ways. Anyway one thing that is clear to >me is that you have to be a very good programmer. No shortcuts there. I was suprised by this opinion at first, since you guys work with GM Alterman. Do you think there is a significant difference between the programmer being a strong player and the programmer working with a strong player?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.