Author: Graham Banks
Date: 00:30:33 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2004 at 01:09:53, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On July 12, 2004 at 23:19:25, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On July 12, 2004 at 21:13:22, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On July 12, 2004 at 19:39:19, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On July 12, 2004 at 19:27:35, Graham Banks wrote: >>>> >>>>>Early days in my brother Ray's testing on a dual Athlon 2800: >>>>> >>>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 TO5 (9-2) >>>>>Shredder 8 v CM9000 Assassin (13.5-6.5) >>>>> >>>>>Assassin is the strongest setting at long time controls that we could come up >>>>>with. >>>>>As I said, still early days in our testing. Much more to be done! >>>> >>>>With less than 30 games, neither result is worth reporting. >>> >>>That's why I said 'early days'! >>>Graham. >> >> >>One thing about these matches though is that we are using ponder off. When >>Shredder 8 starts thinking it is using both processors whereas when CM9000 is >>thinking it only uses one. I suspect that we need to set Shredder 8 up so that >>it only uses a single processor in order to get a fair match. Your thoughts on >>this would be appreciated. >>Graham. > > > Hi Graham > Oops: this is of course a big disadavantage for all > opponents of Shredder 8. On the other hand you seem > to play with Deep Shredder which is not the same. > Kurt Hi Kurt We're going to abandon the matches using Deep Shredder 8. Ray will run 40 game matches Shredder 8 v CM9000 TO5 and Shredder 8 v CM9000 Assassin at 40/120 on his dual Athlon 2800 using ponder on (as each program will have use of a processor). I'll keep those interested of progress via this forum. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.