Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 03:08:40 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2004 at 05:49:58, Joachim Rang wrote: >On July 13, 2004 at 05:06:19, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On July 12, 2004 at 19:05:58, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Congratulations Omid David for getting the best Single Processor Performance. >>>Hopefully you will have a SMP version competing next time. There were two games >>>that your program Falcon could have won by having a 4X Opteron. >> >>Yes, a won position against Crafty, and an almost won position against Diep. >>Falcon would have most probably won both of those games on equal hardware (in >>other words, without such a huge hardware advantage, the opponents wouldn't have >>managed to escape the attack). >> >>A uniform hardware tournament is badly needed (and it does not necessarily have >>to replace the open hardware event). The current "bring any weapon you want" is >>totally meaningless for comparison of programs running on different hardware. >> >> >>> >>>Jorge > >Omid, > >if you want a comparison on equal hardware sent your version to SSDF. As far as I know, the SSDF does not test every engine. >This is >the testing where the _programs_ are compared in a statistical valid way. The >WCCC is about the best weapon, with the best strategy and luck and would loose >its interest if it were a SSDF-Testing reduced to 11 rounds. > >regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.