Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 07:13:56 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2004 at 10:01:50, CLiebert wrote: >>You should know that Rolf Tueschen has his own (uncommon) view on reality and >>that in fact most people would not share his view that Eduard was banned because he pointed out weaknesses in Fritz. In fact it was due to his lack of tolerable behaviour in a specific board (computerschach.de/forum). >> > >Absolutly right, Joachim. Btw Chessbase has nothing to do with >www.computerschach.de. By the way there are a lot of testers pointing out >weaknesses in several public engines. But mostly not always by taking themselfs >in the focus of interest ... ;-) I wouldn't subscribe "nothing to do with Chessbase". I heard there are at least personal connections between the Chessbase-corporation and the publisher of CSS. In fact I was annoyed that certain discussions about Chessbase are not welcomed and some critics about Chessbase, which seemed okay and interesting to my, where deleted or censored in the board. But the way Eduard (and some others) behaved in this board where clearly not tolerable and therefore a ban was correct. regards Joachim > > >Chr. > > >>regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.