Author: Lance Perkins
Date: 15:25:34 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
Indeed. And that is what you see in horse races. Horses have different skills and run differently depending on the kind of race track. And the jockeys have different skills. The winner? The best jockey + horse combination. Have you seen anyone go to the Kentucky Derby with a Donkey and complain that its unfair? Can I go the tournament with minimal book and complain later that my oponents have books prepared by GM's. That can't be "computer" chess anymore. That's human GM chess. On July 13, 2004 at 18:08:23, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On July 13, 2004 at 17:53:20, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Tha's fallacy, my friend. Programs that use different hardware ARE NOT >>indifferent programs than are just by chance riding faster horses; they are >>made to work with this or that hardware, SO to use it is part of the >>programming. > >My program is also made to work with parallel hardware. But as I replied to >Dann, running a parallel engine on a single processor machine is not much fun... > >You can be a great horse rider, but when you are given a donkey, you will most >probably lose to a much less skilled competitor riding a horse. > > >>My bst >>fernando
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.