Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 17:04:35 07/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2004 at 19:06:46, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On July 13, 2004 at 19:01:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Well, then you should have used the parallel thing OR, > >By saying "you should have used the parallel thing" you assume that I actually >had a "parallel thing" and "chose" not to use it. Where did that assumption come >from? If I were given a quad Opteron I would have gladly used it. You just showed up to a Formula-One race with a car that does not fit you best. Michael Schumacher might have been in that situation several years ago. Tough, that is formula one. There are other kind of races with equal "hardware", but you know, most of the people like F1 best, because it tries to be at the limit even if it is not fair. Fair for the pilot is not the point. Miguel > > > >> as now happens, you will >>feel almost cheated and in any case unhappy. You was not given a donkey, you >>chose it because -according to your own words- riding the steed "is not fun". >>Omid, you just went wrong on that, assume it. >>Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.