Author: Sean Empey
Date: 09:14:52 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 12:04:21, steven blincoe wrote: >>I claim only that the situation is not fair if people look at it as a >>competition of programming > > >and this is the very point >people do look at it as the best program has won >most do not know the niceties that this is a hardware dual with a chess program >perhaps many here realize this distinction ,but certainly not most of the >general public >lets watch the claims made by Chessbase now for Junior >"winner of the 2004 WCCC!!!..no doubt >i imagine very little will be made of the hardware that was used > >my hat is off to you and Omni >you took on the big boys with the mega bucks and their multi-million dollar >computers..you had courage..you fought the good fight! >Shalom(peace) to you both >Steve Those machines are not even close to a 1/2 million dollars. The general public didn't know about the tournament. -Sean > > > > > > > > > > because programs that could use better hardware like >>Deep Sjeng or ParSos used only a single processor not because of programming >>advantage and programs that used a single processor did not use the best one not >>because of programming. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.