Author: David Dahlem
Date: 09:15:54 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 12:14:28, Mike Byrne wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 10:35:35, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On July 14, 2004 at 00:25:08, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>first WAC test results with SE ==on it solves the WAC 300 in less time but at a >>>cost of slighltly slower nps >>> >>>White(1): SE on >>>test results summary: >>> >>>total positions searched.......... 300 >>>number right...................... 299 >>>number wrong...................... 1 >>>percentage right.................. 99 >>>percentage wrong.................. 0 >>>total nodes searched.............. 127841920 >>>average search depth.............. 4.6 >>>nodes per second.................. 1353540 >>> >>> >>>White(1): SE off >>>total positions searched.......... 300 >>>number right...................... 299 >>>number wrong...................... 1 >>>percentage right.................. 99 >>>percentage wrong.................. 0 >>>total nodes searched.............. 160561528 >>>average search depth.............. 4.6 >>>nodes per second.................. 1371851 >>> >>> >>>more testing is needed, but there is no doubt this the fastest Crafty I have >>>compiled ...all tests on a dual 1.7 Ghz >> >>When will Crafty 19.15 SE be available? >> >>Thanks >>Dave > >soon ...very soon - there is one feature I decided to add with this version - >to make the DEDECTDRAW compile option (helps solves WAC 230) a crafty.rc command >line option ... so a user can use it anytime they want and not have two >different versions around - I actually believe it plays better without - but >there are some positions where it may be useful in helping decide the best move >- WAC 230 being one of them ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.