Author: Sean Empey
Date: 10:20:57 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 13:04:01, steven blincoe wrote: >>lets watch the claims made by Chessbase now for Junior >>"winner of the 2004 WCCC!!!..no doubt >>i imagine very little will be made of the hardware that was used > > >as i said. >hail to the new WCCC! >no mention of hardware at all >even a comment about Junior demolished ParSOS. > >nope no mention at all of the hardware.. > >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1786 Maybe you shouldn't base your sayings on a site who isn't interested in promoting computer chess but making money. What do you think any commercial on TV or advertisement does? Ever heard of small print? You think they are going to go into the details of the tournament? A title is a title. Is it really that difficult to grasp? > >as long as the perception of this event remains that the best program is the >winner...its then best to have the same hardware in the future >Steve > > > > > > >> >>my hat is off to you and Omni >>you took on the big boys with the mega bucks and their multi-million dollar >>computers..you had courage..you fought the good fight! >>Shalom(peace) to you both >>Steve >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> because programs that could use better hardware like >>>Deep Sjeng or ParSos used only a single processor not because of programming >>>advantage and programs that used a single processor did not use the best one not >>>because of programming. >>> >>>Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.